SOMETHING JUST STRUCK ME...
I doubt that anyone is reading any of this, but please bear in mind the quote from the above article regarding data being kept on people (even when written informally on sticky notes for example).
Then, please read these clear instructions, directly from the Society, in the Febuary 2014 KM..
"This month we are encouraged to work on making a record of the interest.
We must return to those who show interest and teach them...
This requires finding the person again, talking about his concerns, and building on our previous conversation.
Therefore, when we find interest, it is necessary to make a record of it.
How to Do It:
Make sure that you have tools in your witnessing case for recording interest. Keep your records neat, well-organized, and up-to-date.
Make a record as soon as you finish the call.
Write down information about the householder.
What is his name and contact information, such as his address, phone number, or email address?
What did you observe about him and his family that may be signicant?
Write down the details of your conversation.
Record the time, the day of the week, and the date of the visit.
Update your record each time you return.
No harm is done if you write down more information than you need."
[Take note of the wording used: must, necessary, make sure.. These are undeniably instructions, straight from the Society.
Getting rid of those forms does not remove the evidence that all Witnesses are instructed to keep records of householders personal information by the Society.]
Download the KM straight from the official source...
http://download.jw.org/files/media_publickm/7b/km_E_201402.pdf
defender of truth
JoinedPosts by defender of truth
-
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
-
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
And if anyone wants to report anything to the Information Commissioners Office..
https://ico.org.uk/global/contact_us -
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
Even getting rid of official forms may not be enough, according to this..
Data compliance breach firms face fines of up to £500,000
"From quickly scribbled names on a sticky note to full confidential reports, Shropshire businesses have been urged to check they comply with data protection law or face fines of up to £500,000.
And she said it was not just the risk of financial penalties, with brand damage and loss of reputation also enough to send a company under.
“Everything from a Post-It note with a name and telephone number to client surveys and customer reports must be disposed of under the DPA,” she said.
“Every single person in the UK has a legal right to ask at any point what information you hold on them, whether you still hold it and if not, how it was destroyed.
“If your response does not meet data protection laws, a complaint could be made to the Information Commissioner’s Office and that could result in legal action and a fine anywhere up to £500,000.
Not only that but with breaches published on the ICO’s website for anyone to see, the damage to your business’s reputation and brand could be irreversible and even enough to send an organisation under.”
From January to October this year(2014) alone, a total of almost £1 million in fines has been levied by the ICO on organisations in England, Wales and Northern Ireland for data protection breaches.
Even charities are not exempt from the law.."
http://www.shropshirelive.com/2014/11/19/data-compliance-breach-firms-face-fines-of-up-to-500000/ -
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
Terry:
"What issues are REDEFINING this organization are purely along the lines of "follow the money."
------
(For anyone who missed my above posts)
"Some of the main proposals are: introducing fines from data protection authorities of up to €1m (£780,000) or 2 per cent of annual worldwide turnover.."
http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/new-eu-data-protection-laws-a-headache-uk-charities-lawyer-warns/management/article/1321400 -
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
[Sorry, this is my last post now, I'm just trying to lay out some of the main parts of a massive topic. Some may apply to the Watchtower or be useful one day]
"The ISF, working with its members, has identified the top five actions to take.
1- Get your privacy policies, procedures and documentation in order and keep them up to date: data protection authorities will be able to ask for these at any time...
4- Prepare your organisation to fulfil the "right to be forgotten", "right to erasure" and the "right to data portability".
A strategy covering topics such as data classification, retention, collection, destruction, storage and search will be required – and it should cover all mechanisms by which data is collected, including the internet, call centres and paper."
http://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Security-Think-Tank-What-should-UK-business-do-to-prepare-for-new-EU-data-protection-rules-part1 -
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
For anyone who wants to read about the new data protection laws and what they will mean...
http://www.computerweekly.com/guides/Essential-guide-What-the-EU-Data-Protection-Regulation-changes-mean-to-you -
55
No longer to use "house to house record" slips and "please follow up slips"!
by stuckinarut2 ina letter has just been read out indicating that effective immediately, witnesses are no longer to use the s-8 slip known as the "house to house" record slip, as well as the s-43 "please follow up" slip (usually used for foreign language people).. the letter stated that this is because of the changes in privacy laws etc that are becoming common in the world today.. i will try and get a copy of the full letter and post it asap.. .
-
-
defender of truth
It seems that they could be preparing for the new data protection laws..
" New EU data protection laws could be a "real headache" for UK charities if implemented in their current form, an intellectual property lawyer has warned.
Mike Gardner, head of intellectual property at the law firm Wedlake Bell, said he was telling charity clients they should prepare for the laws before they come into force, which is expected to happen between March and September next year."
"..He said these cases had already had very serious consequences for the sector from both a reputational and a financial perspective. If the new EU laws were implemented in their existing form, he said, charities would face increasing costs and scrutiny and more serious penalties if they got it wrong."
"Gardner cited the proposed obligation for any organisation with more than 250 employees to appoint a data protection officer as an example of how difficult the changes could be for charities, saying it would be an "organisational and administrative nightmare" to comply with this rule alone."
"Some of the main proposals are: introducing fines from data protection authorities of up to €1m (£780,000) or 2 per cent of annual worldwide turnover; bringing in a duty to confess, which will mean that charities will need to notify the authorities of a data breach within 24 hours of becoming aware of it and also notify the individuals whose personal data was affected; and specifying that any charity holding data on any person would have to gain explicit consent if they wished to use that data in any way."
http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/new-eu-data-protection-laws-a-headache-uk-charities-lawyer-warns/management/article/1321400 -
26
Dammit Jim, I'm a psychopath not an all loving God!
by Coded Logic inwhen did you discover that the god of bible - and the loving god that you had worshiped your entire life - were not the same?
how did it affect you?.
.
-
-
defender of truth
Cold Steel:
"In the extra-biblical Book of Jasher, it was the animals who formed a protective ring around the ark once it was loaded. The people wanted to break into the ark, but the lions and other predators prevented them. Yet they, themselves, would later die in the flood. I'd always wondered how Noah kept the people away once the ship was complete and loaded. It's a plausible account, I think."
Adding one ridiculous fairytale on top of another makes it MORE plausible?..
This 'account' only makes God seem worse.
He callously used these creatures, that were about to be murdered by Him for no reason at all.. in order to prevent people from trying to escape the slaughter with their families?
Cold Steel:
"It sounds callous to say now, but our sufferings are but a moment. The animals that died in the flood did not suffer horrible deaths, and there are many others that have suffered much more than the ones in the flood. And people."
Firstly, where you said 'it sounds callous to say'.. That is likely your humanity and sense of compassion talking. It is a shame that religious beliefs can cause people to both ignore those feelings, whilst at the same time inventing a God that embodies such a callous disregard for suffering..
Cold Steel:
"Once one conceives of a just God, the suffering is just something we have to go with for now."
Once one invents a God that is 'just', and yet sees the lives, health and emotions of living creatures as expendable or irrelevant because of the long term benefits (imagined or otherwise)...
Then any and all acts of cruelty and murder could be either justified or dismissed as unimportant.
-------
For some examples of animal suffering that God not only tolerated but built into the natural world, see here:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/222352/20/Theists-why-does-God-allow-suffering -
26
Dammit Jim, I'm a psychopath not an all loving God!
by Coded Logic inwhen did you discover that the god of bible - and the loving god that you had worshiped your entire life - were not the same?
how did it affect you?.
.
-
-
defender of truth
"6. God will reward those animals who suffer by resurrecting them to eternal bliss.
This view has been put forward by Irenaeus, Athanasius, C.S. Lewis, Jurgen Moltmann and Keith Ward among others.
While this view seems somewhat absurd to many people, it doesn't answer the problem anyway.
Just because someone is rewarded in the future for the suffering he endures in the present does not excuse the one who is responsible for the suffering.
The suffering is still a wrong no matter how much reward is later given."
http://formerfundy.blogspot.in/2010/05/christian-delusion-chapter-nine.html
..........
For anyone wanting to follow a logical and informative discussion on why a loving God lets animals suffer, this thread is a good read. It was what finally turned me towards atheism..
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/222352/1/Theists-why-does-God-allow-suffering -
72
When Was Jerusalem Destroyed By The Babylonians?
by Smart incan someone explain in easy to understand language what this argument is all about.
i am not that clever.
i am hoping to talk to the elders about this as well as whoever is willing to talk about it on here.
-
-